<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Annotated Gipper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/</link>
	<description>Rob MacDougall Dot Org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:00:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/index.php/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Another one last thing about the Hinckley shooting [something I remember from CHCH Channel 11 News]: When he was recovering [you know, giving press conferences from the hospital in his jammies], it was revealed that at first Reagan didn&#039;t know he was shot, and while the limo sped off he was initially cross with Parr w.r.t. &quot;the tackle&quot; as he thought he was merely suffering a few broken ribs.

p.s. You still haven&#039;t updated your copyright dates for 2008 [let alone 2009], it&#039;s almost like you have more important things on your mind than this here blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another one last thing about the Hinckley shooting [something I remember from CHCH Channel 11 News]: When he was recovering [you know, giving press conferences from the hospital in his jammies], it was revealed that at first Reagan didn&#8217;t know he was shot, and while the limo sped off he was initially cross with Parr w.r.t. &#8220;the tackle&#8221; as he thought he was merely suffering a few broken ribs.</p>
<p>p.s. You still haven&#8217;t updated your copyright dates for 2008 [let alone 2009], it&#8217;s almost like you have more important things on your mind than this here blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/index.php/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>Where is the Paranoia, indeed?

Rollen: you give me too much credit; I&#039;ve never heard that Jackie Kennedy story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the Paranoia, indeed?</p>
<p>Rollen: you give me too much credit; I&#8217;ve never heard that Jackie Kennedy story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/index.php/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-443</guid>
		<description>I got (and giggled at) most of the Lovecraft, B-grade sci-fi movie and (oddly enough) even some of the Reagan refs, I think. But where&#039;s the Paranoia? Oh wait, the whole post was about Reagan, wasn&#039;t it ...

I&#039;ll have to try and track down &lt;em&gt;Murder in the Air&lt;/em&gt;; death rays are one of my research interests (er ... historical ideas of such, not real ones). The nearest British equivalent might be &lt;em&gt;Q-Planes&lt;/em&gt; (1939), starring Ralph Richardson in a wonderfully eccentric performance and a very young Laurence Olivier. Oh, and a shipful of evil Teutonic types shooting down experimental British aircraft with their death ray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got (and giggled at) most of the Lovecraft, B-grade sci-fi movie and (oddly enough) even some of the Reagan refs, I think. But where&#8217;s the Paranoia? Oh wait, the whole post was about Reagan, wasn&#8217;t it &#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to try and track down <em>Murder in the Air</em>; death rays are one of my research interests (er &#8230; historical ideas of such, not real ones). The nearest British equivalent might be <em>Q-Planes</em> (1939), starring Ralph Richardson in a wonderfully eccentric performance and a very young Laurence Olivier. Oh, and a shipful of evil Teutonic types shooting down experimental British aircraft with their death ray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarod</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/index.php/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-442</guid>
		<description>I remember hoping there would be an armada of Star Destroyers circling America, complete with music - but the 80&#039;s came and went and not an Imperial class to be seen. I&#039;m still holding out for the &quot;Ronald Reagan Death Star Spectacular&quot; to enhance our night sky.
&quot;Hey, Buford, that&#039;s no moon!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember hoping there would be an armada of Star Destroyers circling America, complete with music &#8211; but the 80&#8242;s came and went and not an Imperial class to be seen. I&#8217;m still holding out for the &#8220;Ronald Reagan Death Star Spectacular&#8221; to enhance our night sky.<br />
&#8220;Hey, Buford, that&#8217;s no moon!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollen</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Rollen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/index.php/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-441</guid>
		<description>The 80s seemed strange enough from the perspective of elementary school (granted, I spent those days with GI Joes and a subscription to &quot;Time&quot; magazine), and this has only made it stranger.  I can&#039;t claim that I had much more than a third of the references.
As for the unexplicable &quot;Nancy blocked the film&#039;s release,&quot; might you have been inverting the role that Jackie Kennedy played in getting &quot;Who&#039;s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?&quot; into cinemas without the condemnation of key Catholic cardinals?  (That&#039;s what I thought the reference was when I first read the post two days ago.)  If memory serves, Jackie turned to a Cardinal as the credits rolled and said, &quot;Oh, how Jack would have loved it,&quot; and the movie was safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 80s seemed strange enough from the perspective of elementary school (granted, I spent those days with GI Joes and a subscription to &#8220;Time&#8221; magazine), and this has only made it stranger.  I can&#8217;t claim that I had much more than a third of the references.<br />
As for the unexplicable &#8220;Nancy blocked the film&#8217;s release,&#8221; might you have been inverting the role that Jackie Kennedy played in getting &#8220;Who&#8217;s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?&#8221; into cinemas without the condemnation of key Catholic cardinals?  (That&#8217;s what I thought the reference was when I first read the post two days ago.)  If memory serves, Jackie turned to a Cardinal as the credits rolled and said, &#8220;Oh, how Jack would have loved it,&#8221; and the movie was safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Constructivist</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>The Constructivist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/index.php/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-440</guid>
		<description>All right, in the spirit of your post, I got less than 40% of your allusions (I could spot about 90% of &#039;em and you know what? I still found most of them funny).  I guess being relatively conscious for most of the &#039;80s and having a really really bad memory (thank god) allowed your humor to appeal directly to my subconscious mind!  Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All right, in the spirit of your post, I got less than 40% of your allusions (I could spot about 90% of &#8216;em and you know what? I still found most of them funny).  I guess being relatively conscious for most of the &#8217;80s and having a really really bad memory (thank god) allowed your humor to appeal directly to my subconscious mind!  Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old is the New New :: Five For The Gipper</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Old is the New New :: Five For The Gipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/index.php/2007/03/the-annotated-gipper/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>[...] Ronald Reagan Alternate History Film Festival  [Edit: Now with pedantic annotations!] Check your local [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ronald Reagan Alternate History Film Festival  [Edit: Now with pedantic annotations!] Check your local [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

