<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lovelace and Somerville</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2010/03/lovelace-and-somerville/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2010/03/lovelace-and-somerville/</link>
	<description>Rob MacDougall Dot Org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:00:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothy McMillan</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2010/03/lovelace-and-somerville/#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy McMillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/?p=692#comment-1392</guid>
		<description>I suppose this is a personal puff but never mind. My edition of Mary Somerville&#039;s Recollections: Queen of Science (Canongate, 2001) contains passages which for one reason or another Martha Somerville did not include in her edition. I agree, however, that Mary Somerville benefited from the amateur status of science and that ironically its professionalisation was unkind to her reputation. See Alan Chapman&#039;s Mary Somerville (Canopus, 2004)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose this is a personal puff but never mind. My edition of Mary Somerville&#8217;s Recollections: Queen of Science (Canongate, 2001) contains passages which for one reason or another Martha Somerville did not include in her edition. I agree, however, that Mary Somerville benefited from the amateur status of science and that ironically its professionalisation was unkind to her reputation. See Alan Chapman&#8217;s Mary Somerville (Canopus, 2004)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quercki</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2010/03/lovelace-and-somerville/#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>Quercki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 22:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/?p=692#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>Good post! Thanks especially for the pointer to Mary Somerville&#039;s Memoir, which I have been reading with great interest since finding your blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post! Thanks especially for the pointer to Mary Somerville&#8217;s Memoir, which I have been reading with great interest since finding your blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2010/03/lovelace-and-somerville/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/?p=692#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>Thanks, all.

&lt;i&gt;It’s always astonishing to me just how much of the past (95%?) vanishes quickly under detritus and myth, and how little of it we usually think about and access. A little like Tolkein’s Old Forest.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, indeed. And then it&#039;s odd and sort of random which 5% gets chosen to be remembered. And that 5% can change  - as in the case of Ada Lovelace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, all.</p>
<p><i>It’s always astonishing to me just how much of the past (95%?) vanishes quickly under detritus and myth, and how little of it we usually think about and access. A little like Tolkein’s Old Forest.</i></p>
<p>Yes, indeed. And then it&#8217;s odd and sort of random which 5% gets chosen to be remembered. And that 5% can change  &#8211; as in the case of Ada Lovelace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Garrick Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2010/03/lovelace-and-somerville/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Garrick Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 23:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/?p=692#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>A superb post about a fascinating figure.  It&#039;s always astonishing to me just how much of the past (95%?) vanishes quickly under detritus and myth, and how little of it we usually think about and access. A little like Tolkein&#039;s Old Forest, where all the trees are &quot;queer&quot;, and the paths change course and vanish on their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A superb post about a fascinating figure.  It&#8217;s always astonishing to me just how much of the past (95%?) vanishes quickly under detritus and myth, and how little of it we usually think about and access. A little like Tolkein&#8217;s Old Forest, where all the trees are &#8220;queer&#8221;, and the paths change course and vanish on their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2010/03/lovelace-and-somerville/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa Nielsen Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/?p=692#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>What a brilliant blogger you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a brilliant blogger you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Connexion of Lovelace and Somerville &#171; The Floating Academy</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2010/03/lovelace-and-somerville/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Connexion of Lovelace and Somerville &#171; The Floating Academy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/?p=692#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>[...] the achievements of women in technology and science,&#8221;  Rob MacDougall put up a great post about Lovelace&#8217;s mentor Mary Somerville, (much of which he borrows from Jay Clayton&#8217;s Charles Dickens in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the achievements of women in technology and science,&#8221;  Rob MacDougall put up a great post about Lovelace&#8217;s mentor Mary Somerville, (much of which he borrows from Jay Clayton&#8217;s Charles Dickens in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Norwood</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2010/03/lovelace-and-somerville/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Norwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/?p=692#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>I like Clayton&#039;s point about untimely figures. Somerville&#039;s story brings to mind Thomas Paine, another person whose ideas and contributions were too out of sync with the times to gain a foothold in the popular historical narrative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Clayton&#8217;s point about untimely figures. Somerville&#8217;s story brings to mind Thomas Paine, another person whose ideas and contributions were too out of sync with the times to gain a foothold in the popular historical narrative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People to Know (Ada Lovelace Day Edition): Angel Hoekstra</title>
		<link>http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2010/03/lovelace-and-somerville/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>People to Know (Ada Lovelace Day Edition): Angel Hoekstra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmacdougall.org/?p=692#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>[...] Old is the New New (Rob MacDougall) - &#8220;Lovelace and Somerville&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Old is the New New (Rob MacDougall) &#8211; &#8220;Lovelace and Somerville&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

